z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
FORTE radio‐frequency observations of lightning strokes detected by the National Lightning Detection Network
Author(s) -
Jacobson Abram R.,
Cummins Kenneth L.,
Carter Michael,
Klingner Phillip,
RousselDupré Diane,
Knox Stephen O.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: atmospheres
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2000jd900103
Subject(s) - lightning detection , lightning (connector) , upper atmospheric lightning , remote sensing , meteorology , environmental science , satellite , very low frequency , lightning strike , physics , geology , thunderstorm , astronomy , power (physics) , quantum mechanics
This work compares simultaneous observations of lightning from two complementary systems. FORTE is a low‐Earth‐orbit satellite carrying radiowave and optical instruments for the study of lightning. The radio receivers aboard FORTE observe very high frequency (VHF) emissions from the air‐breakdown process preceding (and sometimes accompanying) a lightning current. The National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) is a ground‐based array of sensors in the contiguous United States observing the low‐frequency (LF) and very low frequency (VLF) radiation from vertical currents. Prior to the launch of FORTE in 1997, essentially no work had been done on the statistical correlations between (1) ground‐based LF/VLF and (2) spaced‐based VHF remote sensing of lightning. During a 6‐month campaign in April‐September 1998, FORTE took most of its triggered VHF data over and near the contiguous United States, and NLDN data were specially postprocessed in a loosened‐criterion mode providing enhanced detection range beyond the coastline and borders of the array itself. The time history of reported events from the two systems was compared, and event pairs (each pair containing one event from FORTE, the other from NLDN) which were candidate correlations (closer than 200 ms from each other) were scrutinized to determine whether the members of a pair actually came from the same discharge process. We have found that there is a statistically significant correlation, for a subset of FORTE events. This correlation is most likely to occur for intracloud and less likely to occur for cloud‐to‐ground discharges. The correlated VHF and NLDN events tend to occur within ±30 μs of each other, after correction for the propagation of the VHF signal to FORTE from the NLDN‐geolocated stroke location. Most correlations outside of ±30 μs turn out to be merely a statistical accident. The NLDN‐furnished geolocation allows the correlated FORTE‐detected VHF pulses to be better interpreted. In particular, we can deduce, from the lag of the VHF ground‐reflection echo, the height of the VHF emission region in the storm.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here