z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Controls on floc size in a continental shelf bottom boundary layer
Author(s) -
Hill Paul S.,
Voulgaris George,
Trowbridge John H.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/2000jc900102
Subject(s) - breakup , turbulence , continental shelf , boundary layer , geology , current (fluid) , mechanics , limiting , oceanography , physics , mechanical engineering , engineering
Simultaneous in situ observations of floc size, waves, and currents in a continental shelf bottom boundary layer do not support generally accepted functional relationships between turbulence and floc size in the sea. In September and October 1996 and January 1997, two tripods were deployed in 70 m of water on the continental shelf south of Woods Hole, Massachusetts. On one a camera photographed particles in suspension 1.2 m above the bottom that had equivalent circular diameters larger than 250 μm, and on the other, three horizontally displaced acoustic current meters measured flow velocity 0.35 m above the bottom. The tripods were separated by ∼150 m. Typically, maximal floc diameter stayed relatively constant, around 1 mm, and it showed a dependence on turbulence parameters that was significantly weaker than that predicted by any model that assumes that turbulence‐induced stresses limit floc size. Occasionally, when waves and currents generated intense near‐bed turbulence, flocs were destroyed. These precipitous decreases in maximal floc size also were not predicted by conventional models. The correlation in time between episodes of floe destruction and elevated combined wave‐current stresses provides the first quantitative support for the hypothesis that floc size throughout bottom boundary layers can be controlled by breakup in the intensely sheared near‐bed region. These observations demand a reassessment of the forces limiting floc size in the sea, and they indicate the potential for significant simplifying assumptions in models of floc dynamics.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here