Premium
The thermal state of the upper mantle; No role for mantle plumes
Author(s) -
Anderson Don L.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/2000gl011533
Subject(s) - geology , asthenosphere , subduction , geophysics , volcanism , lithosphere , mantle plume , mantle convection , mantle (geology) , hotspot (geology) , breakup , plume , convection , geodynamics , plate tectonics , tectonics , petrology , seismology , psychology , physics , psychoanalysis , thermodynamics
A variety of geophysical data indicates that long wavelength temperature variations of the asthenosphere depart from the mean by ±200°C, not the ±20°C adopted by plume theoreticians. The ‘normal’ variation, caused by plate tectonic processes (subduction cooling, continental insulation, small‐scale convection) encompasses the temperature excesses that have been attributed to hot jets and thermal plumes. Geophysical estimates of the average potential temperature of the upper mantle are about 1400°C. Asthenospheric convection at ridges, rifts and fracture zones and at the onset of continental breakup is intrinsically 3D, giving rise to shallow pseudoplume‐like structures without deep thermal instabilities. Deep narrow thermal plumes are unnecessary and are precluded by uplift and subsidence data. The locations and volumes of ‘midplate’ volcanism appear to be controlled by lithospheric architecture, stress and cracks.