z-logo
Premium
Estimation of erosion, deposition, and net volumetric change caused by the 1996 Skeiðarársandur jökulhlaup, Iceland, from Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry
Author(s) -
Smith Laurence C.,
Alsdorf Douglas E.,
Magilligan Francis J.,
Gomez Basil,
Mertes Leal A. K.,
Smith Norman D.,
Garvin James B.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
water resources research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.863
H-Index - 217
eISSN - 1944-7973
pISSN - 0043-1397
DOI - 10.1029/1999wr900335
Subject(s) - digital elevation model , elevation (ballistics) , deposition (geology) , geology , synthetic aperture radar , interferometric synthetic aperture radar , erosion , backscatter (email) , glacier , remote sensing , interferometry , fluvial , interpolation (computer graphics) , snow , radar , geomorphology , sediment , hydrology (agriculture) , computer science , geotechnical engineering , structural basin , astronomy , animation , telecommunications , physics , geometry , mathematics , computer graphics (images) , wireless
Using repeat‐pass satellite synthetic aperture radar interferometry, we develop a methodology to measure flood‐induced erosion and deposition and apply it to a record 1996 glacier outburst flood (jökulhlaup) on Skeiðarársandur, Iceland. The procedures include (1) coregistration of backscatter intensity images to observe morphological differences; (2) mapping of interferometric phase correlation to identify preserved and modified surfaces; and (3) construction, correction, and differencing of pre‐jökulhlaup and post‐jökulhlaup topography. Procedures 1 and 2 are robust and should be widely applicable to other fluvial environments, while procedure 3 is complicated by uncertainties in phase measurement, baseline estimate, and atmospheric effects. After a correction procedure involving interpolation of digital elevation model elevation differences across low‐correlation areas, we find ∼4 m of elevation change are required to calculate volumes of erosion or deposition. This condition was satisfied for the 40 km 2 proglacial zone of Skeiðarársandur, where we estimate +38×10 6 m 3 of net sediment deposition along the ice margin, −2 ×10 6 m 3 of net erosion in channels downstream, and a total net balance of +13 × 10 6 . These estimates are supported by field observations and survey data collected in 1997.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here