z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Surface fluxes from satellite winds: Modeling air‐sea flux enhancement from spatial and temporal observations
Author(s) -
Levy Gad,
Vickers Dean
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/1999jc900178
Subject(s) - scatterometer , flux (metallurgy) , environmental science , buoy , satellite , wind speed , advection , drifter , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , remote sensing , geology , physics , oceanography , materials science , lagrangian , astronomy , metallurgy , mathematical physics , thermodynamics
Scatterometer and buoy observations are collocated at different locations spanning a range of climatic regimes in order to (1) develop a spatiotemporal conversion method that allows synergistic use of satellite and in situ data to estimate flux enhancement due to unresolved wind variability, and (2) formulate a resolution‐dependent velocity‐scale term to incorporate in bulk formulas. The scales found in point 1 above rarely agree with advective scales and are considered as the proper averaging scales for calibration of satellite spatially averaged observations against temporal averages. The flux underestimation due to unresolved directional variability in NASA scatterometer (NSCAT) data varies by region, wind regime, and local conditions. It is most important in the Atlantic due to larger subgrid variability and favorable thermodynamic conditions. It is slightly less important in the Gulf of Mexico locations that experience favorable thermodynamic conditions and more light wind cases but smaller subgrid variability for a given light wind value. Even when small, the flux underestimation of the 50‐km NSCAT data represents a systematic error for which a simple correction exists. A general velocity‐scale formulation for typical model scales is developed based on NSCAT observations. It is consistent with studies that used aircraft flux observations. For typical general circulation model scales of 250 km, the associated heat flux enhancement is as much as 10, 23, and 40 W m −2 for strong, midrange, and light wind regimes, respectively. By inserting a simple velocity‐scale formulation into the bulk aerodynamic relationship, a modeler can effectively account for most of the flux underestimation.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here