Open AccessTwo‐phase, near‐field modeling of purposefully released CO 2 in the ocean
Author(s) -
Alendal Guttorm,
Drange Helge
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: oceans
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/1999jc000290
Subject(s) - plume , environmental science , flux (metallurgy) , atmosphere (unit) , dilution , mixing (physics) , seawater , carbon dioxide , panache , atmospheric sciences , water column , tracer , mechanics , chemistry , meteorology , geology , oceanography , thermodynamics , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , nuclear physics
Injection of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) in the ocean has been proposed as an option for accelerating the natural net flux of CO 2 from the atmosphere into the ocean. Liquid CO 2 released as droplets at depths <3000 m will create an ascending plume of droplets and entrained water. As the CO 2 droplets dissolve, carbon is transferred into the plume water, yielding increased density and a lowered pH value of the plume water. As ambient water entrains the CO 2 ‐enriched water by mixing, the density difference disappears and the injected CO 2 follows the ocean dynamics as a dynamically passive tracer. Here we report on numerical experiments performed with a two‐phase Navier Stokes solver. The effects of different droplets sizes, background currents, and injection rates are examined. The numerical experiments show that the droplet size and the background current are key parameter for predicting the vertical distribution of the plume water, the associated reduction in the pH field, and the increase in the plume water density. If rapid dilution of the CO 2 ‐enriched water is the objective (leading to modest reduction in the pH value), large initial droplets and high background currents are preferable. On the other hand, if the objective is to increase the density of the plume water in order to generate a sinking plume (yielding enhanced residence time of the released CO 2 ), CO 2 injection with small droplets in a stagnant water column is optimal.