z-logo
Premium
Effects of pore pressure on compressional wave attenuation in a young oceanic basalt
Author(s) -
Tompkins Michael J.,
Christensen Nikolas I.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
geophysical research letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.007
H-Index - 273
eISSN - 1944-8007
pISSN - 0094-8276
DOI - 10.1029/1999gl900216
Subject(s) - pore water pressure , attenuation , overburden pressure , hydrostatic pressure , geology , basalt , ridge , hydrostatic equilibrium , atmospheric pressure , oceanic crust , mineralogy , crust , geophysics , geotechnical engineering , seismology , mechanics , optics , oceanography , paleontology , physics , subduction , quantum mechanics , tectonics
Laboratory data are reported for ultrasonic compressional wave attenuation (α p ) as a function of pore pressure in a Juan de Fuca Ridge dredge basalt. Four experiments have been made to determine the relationships between attenuation and quality factor (Q p ) and confining and pore pressures in the shallow ocean crust. Attenuation was measured at 1) a constant differential pressure of 40 MPa; 2) confining pressures to 120 MPa and atmospheric pore pressures; 3) a constant confining pressure of 50 MPa while varying pore pressures; 4) a constant confining pressure of 100 MPa while varying pore pressures. For atmospheric pore pressures, α p ranges from 1.64 dB/cm to 7.08 dB/cm (Q p = 24 to 10). In addition, attenuation increases systematically with increasing pore pressure and decreasing differential pressure (confining pressure ‐ pore pressure). Results from DSDP and ODP downhole packer experiments suggest that the hydrostatic pore pressure regime may best approximate in situ conditions for young oceanic crust. Hydrostatic pore pressures (@ 5000 meters depth) reduce Q p as much as 35% from normal atmospheric pressure conditions; therefore, pore pressures generated in the upper oceanic crust may be responsible in part for the observed low seismic Q p within layer 2A. Q p measurements at elevated pore pressures agree well with seismic Q p data.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here