z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
On the role of solar EUV, photoelectrons, and auroral electrons in the chemistry of C( 1 D ) and the production of C I 1931 Å in the cometary coma: A case for comet 1P/Halley
Author(s) -
Bhardwaj Anil
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of geophysical research: planets
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.67
H-Index - 298
eISSN - 2156-2202
pISSN - 0148-0227
DOI - 10.1029/1998je900004
Subject(s) - physics , atomic physics , astrophysics , coma (optics) , photoelectric effect , atomic carbon , excited state , solar flare , hydrogen , optics , quantum mechanics
The observations of C I 1931 Å emission in the ultraviolet spectra of comets show that a large fraction of carbon atoms in the cometary coma are produced in the metastable 1 D excited state. A coupled‐chemistry transport model is employed to examine in detail the various processes of production and loss of the C( 1 D ) atoms in the coma of comet 1P/Halley. Different mechanisms forming CI 1931 Å line are subsequently studied. The impacts of solar UV‐EUV photons, photoelectrons, and auroral electrons of solar wind origin, on the chemistry of C( 1 D ) and the C I 1931 Å emission are evaluated. Dissociation of CO by solar photon and electron impact are the dominant mechanisms of the production of C( 1 D ). Contrary to the findings of the earlier works, the dissociative e ‐CO + recombination is not a significant source of C( 1 D ) in the inner (<10 4 km) coma. Quenching of C( 1 D ) by H 2 O is the main loss mechanism of C( 1 D ) in the inner most coma (<10 3 km), while radiative deexcitation dominates at larger radial distances. The density of C( 1 D ) in the inner coma is found to be controlled predominantly by the CO and H 2 O density distribution. Deep in the coma (<300 km) the photodissociative excitation of CO is the major source of 1931 Å emission, while beyond 500 km the resonant scattering of solar radiation by C( 1 D ) atoms dominates. The contribution of the solar resonance fluorescence to the 1931 Å IUE slit‐averaged intensity is about 80% in the normal and auroral conditions. Results of the model case studies performed to assess the impact of changing C( 1 D ) + H 2 O quenching rate coefficient, C( 1 D ) to C( 3 P ) production ratio, neutral and electron temperatures, and extended CO source are discussed. The modeled intensity of carbon 1931 Å emission is found to be a factor of 3–6 smaller compared to the IUE‐observed intensity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here