z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Optical Intramolecular Electron Transfer in Opposite Directions through the Same Bridge That Follows Different Pathways
Author(s) -
Eric J. Piechota,
Ludovic TroianGautier,
Renato N. Sampaio,
M. Kyle Brennaman,
Ke Hu,
Curtis P. Berlinguette,
Gerald J. Meyer
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
journal of the american chemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 7.115
H-Index - 612
eISSN - 1520-5126
pISSN - 0002-7863
DOI - 10.1021/jacs.8b02715
Subject(s) - chemistry , superexchange , triphenylamine , intramolecular force , electron transfer , covalent bond , molecular orbital , electrochemistry , homo/lumo , photochemistry , crystallography , stereochemistry , molecule , organic chemistry , electrode , ion
The electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of eight bis(tridentate) cyclometalated Ru II compounds covalently linked by a phenyl- or xylyl-thiophene bridge to a pendant triphenylamine (TPA) were characterized in fluid solution and immobilized on metal oxide surfaces. Upon surface immobilization, the TPA +/0 reduction potentials of the phenyl-bridged compounds exhibited large changes, ±100 mV, relative to solution-based values, yet those observed for the xylyl-bridged compounds were relatively unchanged. The highest occupied molecular orbital of the surface-immobilized compounds was associated with either TPA or Ru II , enabling the study of the electron transfer in opposite directions. Electron transfer in the mixed-valent states of the compounds was found to proceed by different optical pathways for Ru II → TPA + relative to TPA → Ru III . Mulliken-Hush analysis of intervalence charge transfer bands for the phenyl-bridged compounds revealed that the electronic coupling matrix element, H DA , was ∼950 cm -1 for Ru II → TPA + , while H DA for TPA → Ru III appeared to be 2500 cm -1 . In contrast, the xylyl-bridged compounds were weakly coupled. A superexchange analysis, where unoccupied bridge orbitals were taken directly into account, led to a very different conclusion: H DA did not depend on the charge-transfer direction or path. The results imply that the electron-transfer direction can alter optical charge transfer pathways without influencing the electronic coupling.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom