
Ebselen, Disulfiram, Carmofur, PX-12, Tideglusib, and Shikonin Are Nonspecific Promiscuous SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Inhibitors
Author(s) -
Chunlong Ma,
Yanmei Hu,
Julia A. Townsend,
Panagiotis Lagarias,
Michael T. Marty,
Antonios Kolocouris,
Jun Wang
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acs pharmacology and translational science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.271
H-Index - 10
ISSN - 2575-9108
DOI - 10.1021/acsptsci.0c00130
Subject(s) - chemistry , protease , proteases , dithiothreitol , biochemistry , celastrol , enzyme , apoptosis
Among the drug targets being investigated for SARS-CoV-2, the viral main protease (M pro ) is one of the most extensively studied. M pro is a cysteine protease that hydrolyzes the viral polyprotein at more than 11 sites. It is highly conserved and has a unique substrate preference for glutamine in the P1 position. Therefore, M pro inhibitors are expected to have broad-spectrum antiviral activity and a high selectivity index. Structurally diverse compounds have been reported as M pro inhibitors. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of action of six previously reported M pro inhibitors, ebselen, disulfiram, tideglusib, carmofur, shikonin, and PX-12, using a consortium of techniques including FRET-based enzymatic assay, thermal shift assay, native mass spectrometry, cellular antiviral assays, and molecular dynamics simulations. Collectively, the results showed that the inhibition of M pro by these six compounds is nonspecific and that the inhibition is abolished or greatly reduced with the addition of reducing reagent 1,4-dithiothreitol (DTT). Without DTT, these six compounds inhibit not only M pro but also a panel of viral cysteine proteases including SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease and 2A pro and 3C pro from enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) and EV-D68. However, none of the compounds inhibits the viral replication of EV-A71 or EV-D68, suggesting that the enzymatic inhibition potency IC 50 values obtained in the absence of DTT cannot be used to faithfully predict their cellular antiviral activity. Overall, we provide compelling evidence suggesting that these six compounds are nonspecific SARS-CoV-2 M pro inhibitors and urge the scientific community to be stringent with hit validation.