z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of Dose and Selection of Two Different Ligands on the Deposition and Antitumor Efficacy of Targeted Nanoparticles in Brain Tumors
Author(s) -
Oguz Turan,
Peter A. Bielecki,
Kathleen Tong,
Gil Covarrubias,
Taylor Moon,
Abdelrahman Rahmy,
Shane Cooley,
Youngjun Park,
Pubudu M. Peiris,
Ketan B. Ghaghada,
Efstathios Karathanasis
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
molecular pharmaceutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.13
H-Index - 127
eISSN - 1543-8392
pISSN - 1543-8384
DOI - 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.9b00693
Subject(s) - nanoparticle , chemistry , glioblastoma , toxicity , drug , cancer research , pharmacology , peptide , brain tumor , nanotechnology , medicine , materials science , pathology , biochemistry , organic chemistry
Deposition of nanoparticles to tumors often can be enhanced by targeting receptors overexpressed in a tumor. However, a tumor may exhibit a finite number of a biomarker that is accessible and targetable by nanoparticles, limiting the available landing spots. To explore this, we selected two different biomarkers that effectively home nanoparticles in brain tumors. Specifically, we used either an α v β 3 integrin-targeting peptide or a fibronectin-targeting peptide as a ligand on nanoparticles termed RGD-NP and CREKA-NP, respectively. In mouse models of glioblastoma multiforme, we systemically injected the nanoparticles loaded with a cytotoxic drug at different doses ranging from 2 to 8 mg/kg drug. The upper dose threshold of RGD-NP is ∼2 mg/kg. CREKA-NP reached its upper dose threshold at 5 mg/kg. For both targeted nanoparticle variants, higher dose did not ensure higher intratumoral drug levels, but it contributed to elevated off-target deposition and potentially greater toxicity. A cocktail combining RGD-NP and CREKA-NP was then administered at a dose corresponding to the upper dose threshold for each formulation resulting in a 3-fold higher intratumoral deposition than the individual formulations. The combination of the two different targeting schemes at the appropriate dose for each nanoparticle variant facilitated remarkable increase in intratumoral drug levels that was not achievable by a sole targeting nanoparticle alone.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here