Open AccessAccelerating Membrane Simulations with Hydrogen Mass Repartitioning
Author(s) -
Curtis Balusek,
Hyea Hwang,
Chun Hon Lau,
Karl Lundquist,
Anthony Hazel,
Ànna Pavlova,
Diane L. Lynch,
Patricia H. Reggio,
Yi Wang,
James C. Gumbart
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of chemical theory and computation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.001
H-Index - 185
eISSN - 1549-9626
pISSN - 1549-9618
DOI - 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00160
Subject(s) - molecular dynamics , membrane , cutoff , chemical physics , hydrogen , diffusion , chemistry , time constant , conductance , materials science , physics , thermodynamics , computational chemistry , biochemistry , organic chemistry , condensed matter physics , quantum mechanics , electrical engineering , engineering
The time step of atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulations is determined by the fastest motions in the system and is typically limited to 2 fs. An increasingly popular approach is to increase the mass of the hydrogen atoms to ∼3 amu and decrease the mass of the parent atom by an equivalent amount. This approach, known as hydrogen-mass repartitioning (HMR), permits time steps up to 4 fs with reasonable simulation stability. While HMR has been applied in many published studies to date, it has not been extensively tested for membrane-containing systems. Here, we compare the results of simulations of a variety of membranes and membrane-protein systems run using a 2 fs time step and a 4 fs time step with HMR. For pure membrane systems, we find almost no difference in structural properties, such as area-per-lipid, electron density profiles, and order parameters, although there are differences in kinetic properties such as the diffusion constant. Conductance through a porin in an applied field, partitioning of a small peptide, hydrogen-bond dynamics, and membrane mixing show very little dependence on HMR and the time step. We also tested a 9 Å cutoff as compared to the standard CHARMM cutoff of 12 Å, finding significant deviations in many properties tested. We conclude that HMR is a valid approach for membrane systems, but a 9 Å cutoff is not.