
Physicochemical Properties of Near-Linear Lanthanide(II) Bis(silylamide) Complexes (Ln = Sm, Eu, Tm, Yb)
Author(s) -
Conrad A. P. Goodwin,
Nicholas F. Chilton,
Gianni F. Vettese,
Eufemio MorenoPineda,
Iain F. Crowe,
Joseph W. Ziller,
Richard E. P. Winpenny,
William J. Evans,
David P. Mills
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
inorganic chemistry
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.348
H-Index - 233
eISSN - 1520-510X
pISSN - 0020-1669
DOI - 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00808
Subject(s) - chemistry , lanthanide , electron paramagnetic resonance , crystallography , paramagnetism , reactivity (psychology) , spectroscopy , yield (engineering) , benzophenone , ion , nuclear magnetic resonance , photochemistry , metallurgy , medicine , physics , alternative medicine , materials science , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , pathology
Following our report of the first near-linear lanthanide (Ln) complex, [Sm(N †† ) 2 ] (1), herein we present the synthesis of [Ln(N †† ) 2 ] [N †† = {N(Si i Pr 3 ) 2 }; Ln = Eu (2), Tm (3), Yb (4)], thus achieving approximate uniaxial geometries for a series of "traditional" Ln II ions. Experimental evidence, together with calculations performed on a model of 4, indicates that dispersion forces are important for stabilization of the near-linear geometries of 1-4. The isolation of 3 under a dinitrogen atmosphere is noteworthy, given that "[Tm(N″)(μ-N″)] 2 " (N″ = {N(SiMe 3 ) 2 }) has not previously been structurally authenticated and reacts rapidly with N 2 (g) to give [{Tm(N″) 2 } 2 (μ-η 2 :η 2 -N 2 )]. Complexes 1-4 have been characterized as appropriate by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, magnetic measurements, electrochemistry, multinuclear NMR, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and electronic spectroscopy, along with computational methods for 3 and 4. The remarkable geometries of monomeric 1-4 lead to interesting physical properties, which complement and contrast with comparatively well understood dimeric [Ln(N″)(μ-N″)] 2 complexes. EPR spectroscopy of 3 shows that the near-linear geometry stabilizes m J states with oblate spheroid electron density distributions, validating our previous suggestions. Cyclic voltammetry experiments carried out on 1-4 did not yield Ln II reduction potentials, so a reactivity study of 1 was performed with selected substrates in order to benchmark the Sm III → Sm II couple. The separate reactions of 1 with 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl (TEMPO), azobenzene, and benzophenone gave crystals of [Sm(N †† ) 2 (TEMPO)] (5), [Sm(N †† ) 2 (N 2 Ph 2 )] (6), and [Sm(N †† ){μ-OPhC(C 6 H 5 )CPh 2 O-κO,O'}] 2 (7), respectively. The isolation of 5-7 shows that the Sm II center in 1 is still accessible despite having two bulky N †† moieties and that the N-donor atoms are able to deviate further from linearity or ligand scrambling occurs in order to accommodate another ligand in the Sm III coordination spheres of the products.