z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Structural Alerts and Random Forest Models in a Consensus Approach for Receptor Binding Molecular Initiating Events
Author(s) -
Andrew J. Wedlake,
Maria Myrto Folia,
Sam Piechota,
Timothy E. H. Allen,
Jonathan M. Goodman,
Steve Gutsell,
Paul Russell
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
chemical research in toxicology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.031
H-Index - 156
eISSN - 1520-5010
pISSN - 0893-228X
DOI - 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00325
Subject(s) - random forest , computer science , bayesian probability , data mining , event (particle physics) , machine learning , random effects model , in silico , artificial intelligence , statistics , mathematics , meta analysis , biology , medicine , quantum mechanics , gene , biochemistry , physics
A molecular initiating event (MIE) is the gateway to an adverse outcome pathway (AOP), a sequence of events ending in an adverse effect. In silico predictions of MIEs are a vital tool in a modern, mechanism-focused approach to chemical risk assessment. For 90 biological targets representing important human MIEs, structural alert-based models have been constructed with an automated procedure that uses Bayesian statistics to iteratively select substructures. These models give impressive average performance statistics (an average of 92% correct predictions across targets), significantly improving on previous models. Random Forest models have been constructed from physicochemical features for the same targets, giving similarly impressive performance statistics (93% correct predictions). A key difference between the models is interpretation of predictions-the structural alert models are transparent and easy to interpret, while Random Forest models can only identify the most important physicochemical features for making predictions. The two complementary models have been combined in a consensus model, improving performance compared to each individual model (94% correct predictions) and increasing confidence in predictions. Variation in model performance has been explained by calculating a modelability index (MODI), using Tanimoto coefficient between Morgan fingerprints to identify nearest neighbor chemicals. This work is an important step toward building confidence in the use of in silico tools for assessment of toxicity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom