Open AccessIn vitro Tau Aggregation Inducer Molecules Influence the Effects of MAPT Mutations on Aggregation Dynamics
Author(s) -
David J. Ingham,
Kelsey M. Hillyer,
Madison J. McGuire,
T. Chris Gamblin
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
biochemistry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.43
H-Index - 253
eISSN - 1520-4995
pISSN - 0006-2960
DOI - 10.1021/acs.biochem.2c00111
Subject(s) - frontotemporal dementia , tau protein , tauopathy , inducer , protein aggregation , in vitro , chemistry , mutation , biology , biophysics , genetics , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , alzheimer's disease , dementia , gene , medicine , disease , neurodegeneration
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Alzheimer's disease-related dementias (ADRDs) affect 6 million Americans, and they are projected to have an estimated health care cost of $355 billion for 2021. A histopathological hallmark of AD and many ADRDs is the aberrant intracellular accumulation of the microtubule-associated protein tau. These neurodegenerative disorders that contain tau aggregates are collectively known as tauopathies, and recent structural studies have shown that different tauopathies are characterized by different "strains" of tau filaments. In addition, mutations in the gene that encodes for tau protein expression have been associated with a group of tauopathies known as frontotemporal dementias with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17 or familial frontotemporal dementia). In vitro studies often use small molecules to induce tau aggregation as tau is extremely soluble and does not spontaneously aggregate under typical laboratory conditions, and the use of authentic filaments to conduct in vitro studies is not feasible. This study highlights how different inducer molecules can have fundamental disparities to how disease-related mutations affect the aggregation dynamics of tau. Using three different classes of tau aggregation inducer molecules, we characterized disease-relevant mutations in tau's PGGG motifs at positions P301S, P332S, and P364S. When comparing these mutations to wild-type tau, we found that depending on the type of inducer molecule used, we saw fundamental differences in total aggregation, aggregation kinetics, immunoreactivity, and filament numbers, length, and width. These data are consistent with the possibility that different tau aggregation inducer molecules make different structural polymorphs, although this possibility would need to be confirmed by high-resolution techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy. The data also show that disease-associated missense mutations in tau impact tau aggregation differently depending on the mechanism of aggregation induction.