Vicarious Liability: Relocating Responsibility For The Quality Of Medical Care
Author(s) -
Clark C. Havighurst
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
american journal of law and medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.312
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 2375-835X
pISSN - 0098-8588
DOI - 10.1017/s0098858800010807
Subject(s) - managed care , health care , distrust , regret , quality (philosophy) , politics , business , public relations , liability , law , political science , finance , philosophy , epistemology , machine learning , computer science
Managed health care has recently generated a great deal of distrust, even anger, in the public mind. To be sure, much of this public reaction is based on anecdotal evidence and one-dimensional thinking. But many unbiased experts observing managed care today are themselves unhappy with the health care industry's performance. While these observers find little justification for the current political backlash against managed care, they are also disappointed that today's health plans have not made a more positive difference. Indeed, informed observers commonly regret that the new arrangements for the financing and delivery of care have done so little to get physicians to adopt truly efficient practices, achieving not only cost reductions but also substantial improvements in health status and patient outcomes— that is, in the quality of care. Although managed care has not demonstrably harmed the overall quality of health care in the United States, it has done little to improve it.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom