Premium
Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Bone Quality of the Mandible Reconstructed by Particular Cellular Bone and Marrow Combined with Platelet Rich Plasma
Author(s) -
Iwamoto Muneharu,
Matsuo Akira,
Kato Noriko,
Takeuchi Sawako,
Takahashi Hidetoshi,
Hojo Satoru,
Chiba Hiroshige
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
oral science international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.256
H-Index - 13
eISSN - 1881-4204
pISSN - 1348-8643
DOI - 10.1016/s1348-8643(09)80001-3
Subject(s) - osseointegration , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , cancellous bone , implant , cortical bone , platelet rich plasma , nuclear medicine , bone marrow , dentistry , bone healing , dental implant , biomedical engineering , medicine , platelet , materials science , chemistry , anatomy , surgery , biology , pathology , botany , genus
Concerning the bone structures of the mandible reconstructed by particular cellular bone and marrow (PCBM), platelet rich plasma (PRP) and tray, we have examined the possibility of implant insertion by clarifying the morphological conditions in each compact and cancellous bone on computed tomography (CT), and by observing the differences in their CT values. Using the computer software program Sim Plant (Materialize Dental, Leuven, Belgium), we morphologically observed 6 cases of implant inserted area after mandibular reconstruction and 11 cases of native bone, and examined the differences in their CT values. The osseointegration rate of each inserted implant was also evaluated. Compared with the native bone group, the PCBM reconstruction group had generally thin compact bone. In the over‐3 cm‐length PCBM reconstruction group, the average CT value was 259.7 ± 94.4 HU (n = 3) in the cancellous bone, whereas in the native bone group, the average CT value was 528.9 ± 140.1 HU (n = 10). Therefore, the PCBM reconstruction group showed significantly lower CT value than the native bone group. However, in the under‐3 cm‐length group, the PCBM reconstruction group showed no significant difference compared with the native bone group. The osseointegration rate of the inserted implants almost 6 months after insertion was 100% in the PCBM reconstruction group and 94.1% in the native bone group. Although the PCBM reconstructed bone had thinner cortical bone and showed lower CT value compared with the native bone, implant insertion was possible.