Open AccessA confirmatory factor analysis of the WMS-III in a clinical sample with crossvalidation in the standardization sample
Author(s) -
D. Bradley Burton,
Joseph J. Ryan,
Bradley N. Axelrod,
Tony Schellenberger,
Heather M Richards
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
archives of clinical neuropsychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.909
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1873-5843
pISSN - 0887-6177
DOI - 10.1016/s0887-6177(02)00149-x
Subject(s) - confirmatory factor analysis , psychology , wechsler adult intelligence scale , lisrel , sample (material) , standardization , goodness of fit , statistics , structural equation modeling , cognition , computer science , mathematics , psychiatry , chemistry , chromatography , operating system
A maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III) was performed by applying LISREL 8 to a general clinical sample (n=281). Analyses were designed to determine which of seven hypothesized oblique factor solutions could best explain memory as measured by the WMS-III. Competing latent variable models were identified in previous studies. Results in the clinical sample were crossvalidated by testing all models in the WMS-III standardization samples (combined n=1,250). Findings in both the clinical and standardization samples supported a four-factor model containing auditory memory, visual memory, working memory, and learning factors. Our analysis differed from that presented in the WMS-III manual and by other authors. We tested our models in a clinical sample and included selected word list subtests in order to test the viability of a learning dimension. Consistent with prior research, we were also unable to empirically support the viability of the immediate and delayed memory indices, despite allowing the error terms between the immediate and delayed memory subtests to correlate.