Premium
A reliable externally fixated murine femoral fracture model that accounts for variation in movement between animals
Author(s) -
Connolly Chris K.,
Li Gang,
Bunn Jonathan R.,
Mushipe Moses,
Dickson Glenn R.,
Marsh David R.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1016/s0736-0266(03)00041-x
Subject(s) - endochondral ossification , animal model , anatomy , bone healing , osteotomy , intramembranous ossification , biomechanics , stiffness , cartilage , biomedical engineering , biology , medicine , materials science , orthodontics , composite material , endocrinology
Fifty‐two CFLP mice had an open femoral diaphyseal osteotomy held in compression by a four‐pin external fixator. The movement of 34 of the mice in their cages was quantified before and after operation, until sacrifice at 4, 8, 16 or 24 days. Thirty‐three specimens underwent histomorphometric analysis and 19 specimens underwent torsional stiffness measurement. The expected combination of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation was observed, and the model was shown to be reliable in that variation in the histological parameters of healing was small between animals at the same time point, compared to the variation between time‐points. There was surprisingly large individual variation in the amount of animal movement about the cage, which correlated with both histomorphometric and mechanical measures of healing. Animals that moved more had larger external calluses containing more cartilage and demonstrated lower torsional stiffness at the same time point. Assuming that movement of the whole animal predicts, at least to some extent, movement at the fracture site, this correlation is what would be expected in a model that involves similar processes to those in human fracture healing. Models such as this, employed to determine the effect of experimental interventions, will yield more information if the natural variation in animal motion is measured and included in the analysis. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.