Premium
Mitogens are increased in the systemic circulation during bone callus healing
Author(s) -
Kaspar Daniela,
NeidlingerWilke Cornelia,
Holbein Oliver,
Claes Lutz,
Ignatius Anita
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00134-1
Subject(s) - bone healing , medicine , callus , growth factor , osteoblast , distraction osteogenesis , stimulation , transforming growth factor , cell growth , endocrinology , surgery , chemistry , distraction , in vitro , biology , receptor , biochemistry , genetics , neuroscience
The influence of mechanical tissue strain caused by flexible fracture fixation on the systemic occurrence of systemic mitogens during callus healing was investigated. For this purpose the mitogenic capacity and growth factor concentration of sera from patients undergoing fracture treatment were determined. Sera from 9 patients whose fractures had been stabilized by external fixation were collected before and during fracture treatment. The sera were added to cell culture media of the osteoblastic cell line SaOS‐2. After 5‐6 days cell proliferation was measured. Transforming growth factor‐β1 (TGF‐β1) and insulin‐like growth factor‐I (IGF‐I) concentrations were analyzed in serum samples from different healing stages. Statistics: paired Wilcoxon‐test. Sera from fracture patients decreased SaOS‐2 proliferation in the first week after surgery ( p <0.05) compared to sera obtained prior to surgery. In the fourth or fifth week proliferation increased significantly ( p <0.03). The increased proliferation of the SaOS‐2 cells was associated with elevated levels of TGF‐β and IGF‐I ( p <0.05). The higher mitogenic activity of sera suggests an increased level of circulating mitogens. In a previous study this increase had also been observed in patients during distraction osteogenesis treatment but not in patients with primary bone healing by a stable fixated plate. It is therefore assumed that their release from the fracture site is a consequence of mechanical stimulation by interfragmentary movement of fracture ends. © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.