Premium
Development‐associated differences in integrative cartilage repair: Roles of biosynthesis and matrix
Author(s) -
Giurea Alexander,
Dimicco Michael A.,
Akeson Wayne H.,
Sah Robert L.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00084-0
Subject(s) - cartilage , fetus , extracellular matrix , matrix (chemical analysis) , explant culture , anatomy , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , in vitro , pathology , medicine , andrology , chemistry , biochemistry , pregnancy , genetics , chromatography
A recurring problem in tissue transplantation therapies for articular cartilage defects is the lack of integration between the implant and the host cartilage. Previous studies have shown that in vitro integration between explants of calf cartilage is markedly higher than that between fetal cartilage, despite similarly high levels of deposition of newly synthesized collagen. The aim of this study was to determine if cellular biosynthesis and extracellular matrix each contribute to these development‐associated differences in integrative repair in vitro. The approach taken was to examine integration between specific combinations of cartilage explants that were apposed for two weeks. The cartilage matrix showed different propensities for repair, as integration of calf live cartilage to calf devitalized cartilage was greater than that of calf live cartilage to fetal devitalized cartilage. An inhibiting factor appeared to be present in fetal cartilage matrix since guanidine treatment of fetal devitalized cartilage was able to enhance its integration. The difference between integration to living cartilage and integration to devitalized cartilage, for calf and fetal tissue, indicated that the biosynthetic contribution to integration by calf cartilage was greater than the biosynthetic contribution by fetal cartilage. Thus, the increasing level of integration between fetal and fetal cartilage, fetal and calf cartilage, and calf and calf cartilage appeared to reflect both biosynthetic and matrix differences. Therapeutic strategies to enhance integration to cartilage may thus target both the extracellular components and the cellular biosynthetic activities of implants and host cartilage. © 2002 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.