z-logo
Premium
Pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler sonography as predictors of ovarian cancer
Author(s) -
Buckshee K.,
Temsu I.,
Bhatla N.,
Deka D.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00018-6
Subject(s) - medicine , radiology , malignancy , adnexal mass , pelvic examination , ultrasound , ovarian cancer , color doppler , laparotomy , transvaginal sonography , physical examination , cancer , ultrasonography , pathology , pregnancy , genetics , biology
Objective: To assess and compare the efficacy of pelvic examination, transvaginal ultrasound and transvaginal color Doppler imaging in differentiating benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Methods: 34 patients with ovarian tumors scheduled for laparotomy underwent pelvic examination and a diagnosis of benign or malignant tumor was made. Transvaginal ultrasound was carried out to study the ovarian morphology followed by color Doppler imaging. A score of ≥9 on Sassone scoring system or a pulsatility index <1 was taken as suspicious for malignancy. Results: Of all the three indicators (pelvic examination, transvaginal sonography and Doppler) transvaginal sonography had the highest sensitivity (100%) and Doppler had maximum specificity (96.29%) for predicting malignancy. However, statistical analysis did not show any difference in the predicting ability of these three modalities. Conclusion: Pelvic examination, transvaginal sonography and Doppler all had similar ability to predict malignancy in an adnexal mass.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here