Premium
CHAPTER 10 A public health approach to cervical cancer control: Considerations of screening and vaccination strategies
Author(s) -
Goldie Sue
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
international journal of gynecology and obstetrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.895
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1879-3479
pISSN - 0020-7292
DOI - 10.1016/s0020-7292(07)60016-2
Subject(s) - medicine , cervical cancer , developing country , disease , vaccination , public health , linkage (software) , cancer , risk analysis (engineering) , family medicine , pathology , economic growth , biochemistry , chemistry , economics , gene
Cervical cancer remains a leading cause of cancer death among women living in low‐resource settings. In the last 3 decades, cytologic screening has —in theory —been available and yet more than 6 million women have died of this preventable disease. The necessary resources, infrastructure, and technological expertise, together with the need for repeated screenings at regular intervals, make cytologic screening difficult to implement in poor countries. As noncytologic approaches for the detection of HPV, simple visual screening methods for anogenital lesions caused by HPV, and the availability of an HPV‐16/18 vaccine will enhance the linkage between screening and treatment, multiple factors will need to be considered when designing new, or modifying existing prevention strategies. Countryspecific decisions regarding the best strategy for cervical cancer control will need to rely on data from many sources and take into account complex epidemiologic, economic, social, political, and cultural factors, and be made despite uncertainty and incomplete information. A rigorous decision analytic approach using computerbased modeling methods enables linkage of the knowledge gained from empirical studies to real‐world situations. This chapter provides an introduction to these methods, reviews lessons learned from cost‐effectiveness analyses of cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries, and emphasizes important qualitative themes to consider in designing cervical cancer prevention policies.