Premium
Plasma buspirone concentrations are greatly increased by erythromycin and itraconazole
Author(s) -
Kivistö Kari T.,
Lamberg Tommi S.,
Kantola Teemu,
Neuvonen Pertti J.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
clinical pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.941
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1532-6535
pISSN - 0009-9236
DOI - 10.1016/s0009-9236(97)90038-2
Subject(s) - buspirone , itraconazole , cmax , pharmacokinetics , erythromycin , pharmacology , triazolam , crossover study , oral administration , placebo , chemistry , medicine , agonist , antibiotics , benzodiazepine , antifungal , biochemistry , receptor , alternative medicine , pathology , dermatology
Background The oral bioavailability of buspirone is very low as a result of extensive first‐pass metabolism. Erythromycin and itraconazole are potent inhibitors of CYP3A4, and they increase plasma concentrations and effects of certain drugs, for example, oral midazolam and triazolam. The possible interactions of buspirone with erythromycin and itraconazole have not been studied before. Methods The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of buspirone were investigated in a randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy crossover study with three phases. Eight young healthy volunteers took either 1.5 gm/day erythromycin, 200 mg/day itraconazole, or placebo orally for 4 days. On day 4, 10 mg buspirone was administered orally. Timed blood samples were collected up to 18 hours, and the effects of buspirone were measured with four psychomotor tests up to 8 hours. Results Erythromycin and itraconazole increased the mean area under the plasma concentration‐time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(0–∞)] of buspirone about sixfold ( p < 0.05) and 19‐fold ( p < 0.01), respectively, compared with placebo. The mean peak plasma concentration (C max ) of buspirone was increased about fivefold ( p < 0.01) and 13‐fold ( p < 0.01) by erythromycin and itraconazole, respectively. These interactions were evident in each subject, although a striking interindividual variability in the extent of both interactions was observed. The elimination half‐life of buspirone did not seem to be prolonged by either erythromycin or itraconazole. The effect of itraconazole on the C max and AUC(0–∞) of buspirone was significantly ( p < 0.01) greater than that of erythromycin. The greatly elevated plasma buspirone concentrations resulted in increased ( p < 0.05) pharmacodynamic effects (as measured by the Digit Symbol Substitution test and the Critical Flicker Fusion test) and in side effects of buspirone. Conclusions Both erythromycin and itraconazole greatly increased plasma buspirone concentrations, obviously by inhibiting its CYP3A4‐mediated first‐pass metabolism. These pharmacokinetic interactions were accompanied by impairment of psychomotor performance and side effects of buspirone. The dose of buspirone should be greatly reduced during concomitant treatment with erythromycin, itraconazole, or other potent inhibitors of CYP3A4. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (1997) 62 , 348–354; doi: