Open AccessComparison of therapeutic efficacy of lipo-doxorubicin and doxorubicin in treating bladder cancer
Author(s) -
DahShyong Yü,
Huiwen Yan,
Ching-Tang Wu,
Shun-Hsing Hung
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
urological science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.155
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 1879-5234
pISSN - 1879-5226
DOI - 10.1016/j.urols.2016.08.001
Subject(s) - doxorubicin , medicine , bladder cancer , flow cytometry , in vivo , cytotoxicity , pharmacology , urology , chemotherapy , cancer , immunology , in vitro , chemistry , biology , biochemistry , microbiology and biotechnology
ObjectivesDoxorubicin is commonly used in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer, but more side effects and shorter intracellular retention time hamper its clinical application. Since lipo-doxorubicin (Lipodox) has the advantages of longer half-life and lower clearance rate than doxorubicin, it should improve the efficacy of tumor therapy and reduce the normal tissue toxicity of doxorubicin.Materials and MethodsIn this study, we compared the cytotoxicity of Lipodox and doxorubicin in different treatment durations on bladder cancer cells by 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Drug distribution was tracked under fluorescence microscopy. The metabolic rate after treatment was measured by serial flow cytometry. Finally, an in vivo orthotopic MBT-2 bladder tumor model was established for comparing the differences of therapeutic efficacy, including tumor weight and survival rate.ResultsThe 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of doxorubicin and Lipodox for MBT-2 cells was 0.62 μg/mL and 130 μg/mL, respectively, after 48 hours treatment. Lipo-dox presented higher cytotoxicity than doxorubicin at 6 hours (93% vs 73%) and 12 hours (93% vs 80%) treatment. After drug treatment, Lipodox fluorescence distribution was observed mostly in the cell membrane, lysosomes, and nuclei of tumor cells, while doxorubicin was concentrated in the nuclei. Initial fluorescence intensity of doxorubicin was 27.3 times that of Lipodox (p < 0.001) at time of treatment. The fluorescence intensity of doxorubicin decreased to 12% after 24 hours culture but that of Lipodox remained at 81%. In an orthotopic model, the average tumor weight and survival were: control group: 1.0 ± 0.3 g, 25%; doxorubicin treatment group: 0.7 ± 0.05 g, 43%; and Lipodox treatment group: 0.2 ± 0.1 g, 57%.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that Lipodox can enhance doxorubicin cytotoxicity in bladder cancer cells and inhibit tumor growth in orthotopic bladder cancer with improved survival rate. Therefore, we suggest Lipodox may act as an alternative to doxorubicin in the treatment of local bladder cancer