Verification of a Pedestrian Simulation Tool Using the NIST Recommended Test Cases
Author(s) -
Michelle L. Isenhour,
Rainald Löhner
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
transportation research procedia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.657
H-Index - 40
eISSN - 2352-1465
pISSN - 2352-1457
DOI - 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.042
Subject(s) - nist , pedestrian , computer science , code (set theory) , test (biology) , set (abstract data type) , simulation , engineering , transport engineering , programming language , paleontology , natural language processing , biology
In an attempt to develop a verification and validation standard for building fire evacuation models, Ronchi et al. (2013) at the United States’ National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) recommended a set of seventeen verification tests. We found that the application of these verification tests allowed us to make rather significant improvements to our simulation code (PEDFLOW) for approximately half of the recommended tests (Table 1). In some cases, we added capabilities that did not exist before. In other cases, we found anomalous behaviors and adjusted the existing code to remove these unexplained behaviors. This paper summarizes the work on the verification tests, highlighting the lessons learned and modifications made. We also discuss some modifications we recommend to the NIST verification tests, as well as demonstrate how to make these tests suitable for all pedestrian flow models (not just building fire evacuation)
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom