z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Speed of processing training results in lower risk of dementia
Author(s) -
Edwards Jerri D.,
Xu Huiping,
Clark Daniel O.,
Guey Lin T.,
Ross Lesley A.,
Unverzagt Frederick W.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia: translational research and clinical interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.49
H-Index - 30
ISSN - 2352-8737
DOI - 10.1016/j.trci.2017.09.002
Subject(s) - dementia , hazard ratio , medicine , cognitive training , confidence interval , cognition , randomized controlled trial , booster (rocketry) , effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance , relative risk , physical therapy , psychiatry , disease , physics , astronomy
Cognitive training improves cognitive performance and delays functional impairment, but its effects on dementia are not known. We examined whether three different types of cognitive training lowered the risk of dementia across 10 years of follow‐up relative to control and if greater number of training sessions attended was associated with lower dementia risk. Methods The Advanced Cognitive Training in Vital Elderly ( NCT00298558 ) study was a randomized controlled trial (N = 2802) among initially healthy older adults, which examined the efficacy of three cognitive training programs (memory, reasoning, or speed of processing) relative to a no‐contact control condition. Up to 10 training sessions were delivered over 6 weeks with up to four sessions of booster training delivered at 11 months and a second set of up to four booster sessions at 35 months. Outcome assessments were taken immediately after intervention and at intervals over 10 years. Dementia was defined using a combination of interview‐ and performance‐based methods. Results A total of 260 cases of dementia were identified during the follow‐up. Speed training resulted in reduced risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.998, P  = .049) compared to control, but memory and reasoning training did not (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.57–1.11, P  = .177 and HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.56–1.10, P  = .163, respectively). Each additional speed training session was associated with a 10% lower hazard for dementia (unadjusted HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.85–0.95, P  < .001). Discussion Initially, healthy older adults randomized to speed of processing cognitive training had a 29% reduction in their risk of dementia after 10 years of follow‐up compared to the untreated control group.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here