Open AccessThe effect of diagnostic criteria on outcome measures in preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease: Implications for trial design
Author(s) -
Bertens Daniela,
Tijms Betty M.,
Vermunt Lisa,
Prins Niels D.,
Scheltens Philip,
Visser Pieter Jelle
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
alzheimer's and dementia: translational research and clinical interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.49
H-Index - 30
ISSN - 2352-8737
DOI - 10.1016/j.trci.2017.08.005
Subject(s) - prodromal stage , neuroimaging , disease , medicine , stage (stratigraphy) , alzheimer's disease , magnetic resonance imaging , cognitive decline , cognitive impairment , cognition , oncology , surrogate endpoint , psychology , pathology , dementia , psychiatry , radiology , biology , paleontology
We investigated the influence of different inclusion criteria for preclinical and prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) on changes in biomarkers and cognitive markers and on trial sample size estimates. Methods We selected 522 cognitively normal subjects and 872 subjects with mild cognitive impairment from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. Compared inclusion criteria were (1) preclinical or prodromal AD (amyloid marker abnormal); (2) preclinical or prodromal AD stage‐1 (amyloid marker abnormal, injury marker normal); and (3) preclinical or prodromal AD stage‐2 (amyloid and injury markers abnormal). Outcome measures were amyloid, neuronal injury, and cognitive markers. Results In both subjects with preclinical and prodromal AD stage‐2, inclusion criteria resulted in the largest observed decline in brain volumetric measures on magnetic resonance imaging and cognitive markers. Discussion Inclusion criteria influence the observed rate of worsening in outcome measures. This has implications for trial design.