z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
In vitro study on the sensibility and reproducibility of the new T‐Scan®III HD system
Author(s) -
Mário Jorge da Silva Martins,
Francisco Caramelo,
Júlio Fonseca,
Pedro Nicolau
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
revista portuguesa de estomatologia, medicina dentária e cirurgia maxilofacial
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.144
H-Index - 8
eISSN - 1647-6700
pISSN - 1646-2890
DOI - 10.1016/j.rpemd.2014.01.001
Subject(s) - reproducibility , sensibility , biomedical engineering , chemistry , art , medicine , chromatography , literature
ObjectivesThe present study aims to test, under different simulated anatomic circumstances the sensitivity and reproducibility of the T‐Scan®III HD sensor (T‐Scan® Tekscan Incorporation, Boston, USA), the newest generation of a computerized occlusal analysis device.MethodsFour different occlusal tables were created: two of 120° represented by an artificial inferior first molar either embedded in a periodontal‐ligament‐simulator or not; one of 100° (simulating the occlusion of anterior teeth) and a plane surface (180°) in static and variable positions. Three levels of force (10N, 50N and 150N) were applied, 40 times each, by a universal testing machine (Autograph®, AG‐I) with a spherical bur (diameter=2.2mm) on the sensor film. One‐way ANOVAs with Bonferroni corrections for post hoc tests were used for multiple comparisons.ResultsAccording to our study, 85% of the outliers are within the 5 first closures, representing the conditioning time required by the initially flat sensor. Graphically and statistically sustained differences (p<0.05) in the recorded data could only be found when the sensor's position was switched between closures, but not in the other circumstances.ConclusionsAn undeniable improvement of the T‐Scan®III HD system as compared to former designs could be shown. The anatomic circumstances did not influence the sensor's sensibility or reproducibility. However, further studies on the varying sensitivity throughout its sensing surface are required. Its reproducibility could be proved, except for the 5 first values (outliers to the mean values), which shall be used as a conditioning time to both the sensor and the patient

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here