
Una formulación de mínimo peso con restricciones en tensión en optimización topológica de estructuras
Author(s) -
José París,
Servet Martı́nez,
Xesús Nogueira,
Ignasi Colominas,
F. Navarrina,
Manuel Casteleiro
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
revista internacional de métodos numéricos para cálculo y diseño en ingeniería
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.213
H-Index - 9
eISSN - 1886-158X
pISSN - 0213-1315
DOI - 10.1016/j.rimni.2011.11.002
Subject(s) - stiffness , topology optimization , point (geometry) , mathematical optimization , topology (electrical circuits) , type (biology) , mathematics , optimal design , computer science , structural engineering , finite element method , geometry , engineering , combinatorics , ecology , statistics , biology
Optimum design of structures has been traditionally focused on the analysis of shape and dimensions optimization problems. However, more recently a new discipline has emerged: the topology optimization of the structures. This discipline states innovative models that allow to obtain optimal solutions without a previous definition of the type of structure being considered. These formulations obtain the optimal topology and the optimal shape and size of the resulting elements. The most usual formulations of the topology optimization problem try to obtain the structure of maximum stiffness. These approaches maximize the stiffness for a given amount of material to be used. These formulations have been widely analyzed and applied in engineering but they present considerable drawbacks from a numerical and from a practical point of view. In this paper the author propose a different formulation, as an alternative to maximum stiffness approaches, that minimizes the weight and includes stress constraints. The advantages of this kind of formulations are crucial since the cost of the structure is minimized, which is the most frequent objective in engineering, and they guarantee the structural feasibility since stresses are constrained. In addition, this approach allows to avoid some of the drawbacks and numerical instabilities related to maximum stiffness approaches. Finally, some practical examples have been solved in order to verify the validity of the results obtained and the advantages of the proposed formulation