Premium
What Types of Treatment Are Provided for Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? A Retrospective Analysis of Commercial Insurance
Author(s) -
Baker Nancy A.,
Stevans Joel M.,
Terhorst Lauren,
Haas Allen M.,
Kuo YongFan,
Al Snih Soham
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.02.004
Subject(s) - medicine , carpal tunnel syndrome , retrospective cohort study , cohort , health insurance , carpal tunnel release , diagnosis code , surgery , physical therapy , emergency medicine , health care , population , environmental health , economics , economic growth
Background Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in commercially insured patients across the spectrum of provider types rarely has been described. Objective To describe patterns of types of treatment for patients with CTS using a large commercial insurance database. Design Retrospective cohort descriptive study. Setting Administrative health data from the Clinformatics Data Mart (OptumInsight, Eden Prairie, MN). Patients Adults with a primary diagnosis of CTS seen from between January 2010 to December 2012 who had a total of 48 months of continuous data (12 months before diagnosis and 36 months after diagnosis) (n = 24,931). Outcomes Frequency of types of treatment (heat, manual therapy, positioning, steroids, stretching, surgery) by number of treatments, number of visits, provider type, and characteristics. Results Fifty‐four percent of patients received no reported treatment, and 50.4% had no additional visits. Surgery (42.5%) and positioning (39.8%) were the most frequent single treatments. Patients who were seen by orthopedist for their first visit more frequently received some treatment (75.1%) and at least 1 additional visit (74.1%) compared with those seen by general practitioners (59.5%, 57.5%, respectively) or other providers (65.4%, 68.4, respectively). Orthopedists more frequently prescribed positioning devices (26.8%) and surgery (36.8%) than general practitioners (18.8%, 14.1%, respectively) or other providers (15.7%, 19.7%, respectively). Older adults more frequently had CTS surgery, as did people who lived in the Midwest. Overall, only 24% of patients with CTS had surgery. Conclusions For more than one‐half of patients with CTS no treatment was provided after an initial visit. Surgery rates were much lower than what has previously been reported in the literature. Generally, patients with CTS receive treatments that are supported by current treatment guidelines. Level of Evidence NA