Premium
Electromyographic Activity of Shoulder Girdle Muscles in Patients With Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Author(s) -
Spall Peter,
Ribeiro Daniel Cury,
Sole Gisela
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.02.015
Subject(s) - rotator cuff , medicine , isometric exercise , shoulders , tears , asymptomatic , shoulder girdle , meta analysis , rotator cuff injury , electromyography , cuff , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery
Objectives To compare electromyographic activity in patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears with healthy controls or to those with asymptomatic cuff tears. Type Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Literature Survey PubMed, Scopus, Ovid Medline, and Web of Science were searched from inception to August 1, 2014, and a search update was performed on June 8, 2015. Methodology Case‐control studies or intervention studies that had baseline comparisons for symptomatic versus healthy shoulders or those with asymptomatic rotator cuff tear were searched. Methodological quality was assessed with a modified Critical Appraisal Skills Programme score and meta‐analyses were performed when 2 or more studies explored the same outcome measures. Synthesis Nine studies were included, with the quality ranging from 1 to 3 (maximum 6). Electromyographic outcomes included amplitudes and ratios thereof, activity duration, and median frequency of shoulder girdle muscles during isometric contractions (4 studies) and functional tasks (5 studies). Longer activity duration was found for upper trapezius during glenohumeral movements, and greater fatigability of anterior and middle deltoids during isometric hand gripping for patients with rotator cuff tears compared to controls. The meta‐analysis (3 studies) showed that patients with rotator cuff tears had lower activation ratios for latissimus dorsi during isometric abduction contraction compared to controls ( P < .001), indicating greater co‐contraction of adductors for the injured shoulders. Conclusions Although various electromyographic domains were explored, these were generally limited to one publication or research group. Current evidence for muscle activity differences between the rotator cuff tear group and controls is thus limited.