Premium
The Effect of Prolonged Standing on Touch Sensitivity Threshold of the Foot: A Pilot Study
Author(s) -
Wiggermann Neal E.,
Werner Robert A.,
Keyserling W. Monroe
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.11.002
Subject(s) - foot (prosody) , heel , medicine , dorsum , plantar flexion , sensitivity (control systems) , significant difference , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , surgery , anatomy , ankle , philosophy , linguistics , electronic engineering , engineering
Objective To determine the effect of prolonged standing on touch sensitivity of the foot. Design An observational study with replications. Setting University laboratory. Participants Ten healthy college students (5 men and 5 women), with a mean ± SD age of 23.5 ± 4.1 years and body mass of 67.4 ± 12.6 kg. Methods Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament tests were administered to 12 locations on the dorsal and plantar surfaces of the foot before and after 4 hours of standing. These locations were formed into several groupings (toes, metatarsal heads, midfoot, heel, all plantar sites, all dorsal sites), and paired t ‐tests were used to test for significant changes in sensitivity threshold after standing. Main Outcome Measurement The difference between sensitivity thresholds measured before and after standing for different locations on the foot. Results The average of all sensitivity thresholds on the plantar surface of the foot decreased (indicating increased sensitivity) from 0.56 to 0.36 g ( P < .01) after 4 hours of prolonged standing. This change in threshold equated to a difference of 1 Semmes‐Weinstein monofilament level. Changes in the sensitivity threshold of the dorsal aspect of the foot were not significant. Conclusions Analysis of the results suggests that the plantar foot has greater sensitivity to touch after prolonged standing. These findings may be useful for identifying potential unintended bias in clinical touch sensitivity testing. Future research is necessary to understand the underlying mechanisms for this sensitivity change and to determine the onset and recovery times for sensitivity changes.