Premium
Spatiotemporal and Kinematic Effect of Peroneal Nerve Stimulation Versus an Ankle‐Foot Orthosis in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis: A Case Series
Author(s) -
Sheffler Lynne R.,
Bailey Stephanie Nogan,
Chae John
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.04.002
Subject(s) - physical medicine and rehabilitation , kinematics , cadence , ankle , gait , medicine , ankle dorsiflexion , gait analysis , swing , functional electrical stimulation , physical therapy , stimulation , surgery , physics , classical mechanics , acoustics
Objective To compare the effect of a surface peroneal nerve stimulator (PNS) versus an ankle‐foot orthosis (AFO) on spatiotemporal and kinematic parameters of gait in patients with multiple sclerosis. Design This was a case series design. Participants Four subjects with multiple sclerosis and dorsiflexion weakness. Intervention Quantitative gait analysis with the use of (1) no device, (2) AFO, and (3) PNS as a single point‐in‐time assessment. Outcome Measures Included walking speed, stride length, cadence, and double support time; kinematic parameters included peak pelvic obliquity during swing, peak contralateral hip abduction during stance, peak knee flexion and hip flexion during swing, ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact, and peak ankle internal rotation during swing. Results One‐way analysis of variance was used to compare intrasubject performance under the 3 device conditions. The PNS significantly increased ankle dorsiflexion angle at initial contact, as compared with both no device and the AFO, in 3 of the 4 subjects. However, other spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters were more variably affected by the device conditions. Conclusions With the exception of ankle dorsiflexion angle at initial contact, PNS and AFO have a variable effect on spatiotemporal and kinematic gait parameters in individual subjects with multiple sclerosis. Further studies are indicated to determine the clinical significance of intrasubject differences between device conditions.