Premium
A Prospective, Masked 18‐Month Minimum Follow‐up On Neurophysiologic Changes In Persons with Spinal Stenosis, Low Back Pain, and No Symptoms
Author(s) -
Haig Andrew J.,
Yamakawa Karen S.J.,
Parres Christopher,
Chiodo Anthony,
Tong Henry
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
pmandr
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.617
H-Index - 66
eISSN - 1934-1563
pISSN - 1934-1482
DOI - 10.1016/j.pmrj.2008.10.007
Subject(s) - medicine , spinal stenosis , magnetic resonance imaging , electromyography , stenosis , physical examination , low back pain , denervation , prospective cohort study , radiology , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , pathology , lumbar , alternative medicine
Objectives To describe neurophysiologic changes over time in persons with and without spinal complaints and to assess whether paraspinal denervation predicts change in stenosis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical course. Design Prospective, controlled, masked trial. Setting University spine program. Participants Persons aged 55 to 80 years, screened for polyneuropathy and determined on clinical examination to have spinal stenosis, mechanical low back pain, or no spinal symptoms. Interventions A comprehensive codified history was obtained and subjects underwent physical examination, ambulation testing, masked electrodiagnostic testing including paraspinal mapping, and MRI, repeated at greater than 18 months. This study presents detailed technical information and additional analyses not reported previously. Main Outcome Measurements Change in electrodiagnostic findings. Among persons with clinical stenosis, relationship of change in paraspinal mapping scores to MRI findings and clinical changes. Results Of 149 initial subjects, 83 (79.3% of eligible subjects) repeated testing at 20 (±2 SDs) months. No significant change in limb muscle spontaneous activity or motor unit pathology was noted in any group. In 23 persons with initial diagnosis of stenosis, paraspinal mapping electromyography related to change in diagnosis over time (analysis of variance F = 3.77, P = .037), but not to most initial magnetic resonance imaging measurements or to change in spinal canal diameter. Conclusions Clinical spinal stenosis is neurophysiologically stable in most persons. Paraspinal electromyographic changes reflect large changes in clinical course, but neither neurophysiologic nor clinical changes relate to change in spinal geometry over 20 months.