Premium
Accuracy and precision of radiostereometric analysis in the measurement of three‐dimensional micromotion in a fracture model of the distal radius
Author(s) -
Madanat Rami,
Mäkinen Tatu J.,
Moritz Niko,
Mattila Kimmo T.,
Aro Hannu T.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.07.002
Subject(s) - radius , displacement (psychology) , accuracy and precision , rotation (mathematics) , transverse plane , standard deviation , fracture (geology) , translation (biology) , perpendicular , calibration , biomedical engineering , physics , orthodontics , optics , materials science , mathematics , computer science , geometry , medicine , chemistry , anatomy , statistics , psychology , biochemistry , messenger rna , gene , composite material , psychotherapist , computer security
Abstract The purpose of the current study was to verify the feasibility of radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in monitoring three‐dimensional fracture micromotion in fractures of the distal radius. The experimental set‐up consisted of a simulated model of an extra‐articular Colles' fracture, including metallic beads inserted into the bone on either side of the fracture site. The model was rigidly fixed to high precision micrometer stages allowing controlled translation in three axes and rotation about the longitudinal and transverse axes. The whole construct was placed inside a RSA calibration cage with two perpendicular radiographic film cassettes. Accuracy was calculated as the 95% prediction intervals from the regression analyses between the micromotion measured by RSA and actual displacements measured by micrometers. Precision was determined as the standard deviation of five repeated measurements of a 200 μm displacement or a 0.5° rotation along a specific axis. Translations from 25 μm to 5 mm were measured with an accuracy of ±6μm and translations of 200μm were measured with a precision of 2–6 μm. Rotations ranging from 1/6° to 2° were measured with an accuracy of ±0.073° and rotations of 1/2° were measured with a precision of 0.025°–0.096°. The number of markers and their configuration had greater impact on the accuracy and precision of rotation than on those of translation. Aside from the unknown rate of clinical marker loosening, the current results favor the use of at least four markers in each bone fragment in distal radius fractures. These results suggest a strong rationale for the use of RSA as an objective tool for comparing different treatment modalities and novel bone graft substitutes aimed at stabilization of fractures of the distal radius. © 2004 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.