z-logo
Premium
Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion
Author(s) -
Widmer K.H.,
Zurfluh B.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
journal of orthopaedic research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.041
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1554-527X
pISSN - 0736-0266
DOI - 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.001
Subject(s) - range of motion , radiography , orthodontics , total hip arthroplasty , arthroplasty , orientation (vector space) , femoral neck , orthopedic surgery , external rotation , medicine , surgery , mathematics , geometry , osteoporosis , endocrinology
Abstract Impingement between femoral neck and endoprosthetic cup is one of the causes for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Choosing a correct combined orientation of both components, the acetabular cup and femoral stem, in manual or computer‐assisted implantation will yield a maximized, stable range of motion (ROM) and will reduce the risk for dislocation. A mathematical model of a THA was developed to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion for maximizing ROM and minimizing the risk for cup–neck impingement. Single and combined hip joint motions were tested. A radiographic definition was used for component orientation. Additional parameters, such as stem–neck (CCD) angle, head–neck ratio, and the design of the acetabular opening, were also considered. The model showed that a maximized and safe ROM requires compliant, well‐defined combinations of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion depending on the intended ROM. Radiographic cup anteversion and stem antetorsion were linearly correlated. Additional internal rotation reduced flexion, and additional external rotation reduced extension, abduction and adduction. The articulating hemispheric surface of acetabular cups should be oriented between 40° and 45° of radiographic inclination, between 20° and 28° of radiographic cup anteversion, and should be combined with stem antetorsion so that the sum of cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 37°. Final component orientation must also consider cup containment, implant impingement with bone and soft tissue, and preoperative skeletal contractures or deformities to achieve the optimal compromise for each patient. © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here