Open AccessAssessment of the stromal contribution to Sonic Hedgehog‐dependent pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Author(s) -
Damhofer Helene,
Medema Jan Paul,
Veenstra Veronique L.,
Badea Liviu,
Popescu Irinel,
Roelink Henk,
Bijlsma Maarten F.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
molecular oncology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.332
H-Index - 88
eISSN - 1878-0261
pISSN - 1574-7891
DOI - 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.08.004
Subject(s) - sonic hedgehog , stromal cell , adenocarcinoma , cancer research , medicine , hedgehog signaling pathway , biology , pathology , oncology , microbiology and biotechnology , signal transduction , cancer
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most lethal malignancies. It is typically detected at an advanced stage, at which the therapeutic options are very limited. One remarkable feature of PDAC that contributes to its resilience to treatment is the extreme stromal activation seen in these tumors. Often, the vast majority of tumor bulk consists of non‐tumor cells that together provide a tumor‐promoting environment. One of the signals that maintains and activates the stroma is the developmental protein Sonic Hedgehog (SHH). As the disease progresses, tumor cells produce increasing amounts of SHH, which activates the surrounding stroma to aid in tumor progression. To better understand this response and identify targets for inhibition, we aimed to elucidate the proteins that mediate the SHH‐driven stromal response in PDAC. For this a novel mixed‐species coculture model was set up in which the cancer cells are human, and the stroma is modeled by mouse fibroblasts. In conjunction with next‐generation sequencing we were able to use the sequence difference between these species to genetically distinguish between the epithelial and stromal responses to SHH. The stromal SHH‐dependent genes from this analysis were validated and their relevance for human disease was subsequently determined in two independent patient cohorts. In non‐microdissected tissue from PDAC patients, in which a large amount of stroma is present, the targets were confirmed to associate with tumor stroma versus normal pancreatic tissue. Patient survival analysis and immunohistochemistry identified CDA, EDIL3, ITGB4, PLAUR and SPOCK1 as SHH‐dependent stromal factors that are associated with poor prognosis in PDAC patients. Summarizing, the presented data provide insight into the role of the activated stroma in PDAC, and how SHH acts to mediate this response. In addition, the study has yielded several candidates that are interesting therapeutic targets for a disease for which treatment options are still inadequate.