Open AccessClinical performance of a new hepatitis B surface antigen quantitative assay with automatic dilution
Author(s) -
Liu TaWei,
Yeh MingLun,
Huang ChungFeng,
Lin I.Ling,
Huang JeeFu,
Dai ChiaYen,
Chen YaoLi,
Chuang WanLong,
Yu MingLung
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.439
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 2410-8650
pISSN - 1607-551X
DOI - 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.10.007
Subject(s) - medicine , dilution , antigen , chromatography , virology , immunology , chemistry , physics , thermodynamics
Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) levels reflect disease status and can predict the clinical response to antiviral treatment; however, the emergence of HBsAg mutant strains has become a challenge. The Abbott HBsAg quantification assay provides enhanced detection of HBsAg and HBsAg mutants. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Abbott HBsAg quantification assay with automatic sample dilutions (shortened as automatic Architect assay), compared with the Abbott HBsAg quantification assay with manual sample dilutions (shortened as manual Architect assay) and the Roche HBsAg quantification assay with automatic sample dilutions (shortened as Elecsys). A total of 130 sera samples obtained from 87 hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐infected patients were collected to assess the correlation between the automatic and manual Architect assays. Among the 87 patients, 41 provided 42 sera samples to confirm the linearity and reproducibility of the automatic Architect assay, and find out the correlation among the Elecsys and two Architect assays. The coefficients of variation (0.44–9.53%) and R 2 = 0.996–1, which were both determined using values obtained from the automatic Architect assay, showed good reproducibility and linearity. Results of the two Architect assays demonstrated a feasible correlation ( n = 130 samples; R = 0.898, p < 0.01). With regard to subgroups, correlations between the two Architect assays were better in the hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐negative group (HBeAg‐negative group vs. HBeAg‐positive group: R = 0.885 vs. R = 0.865, both p < 0.01) and low HBV DNA group (low DNA group vs. high DNA group: R = 0.886 vs. R = 0.844, both p < 0.01). Significant correlations were also found between the results of the Elecsys and Architect assays ( R > 0.93 in all cases). In conclusion, the correlation between the automatic and manual dilution Architect assays was feasible, particularly in the HBeAg‐negative and low DNA groups. With lower labor costs and less human error than the manual version, the Abbott automatic dilution Architect assay provided a good clinical performance with regard to the HBsAg levels.