z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The impact of an interprofessional problem‐based learning curriculum of clinical ethics on medical and nursing students' attitudes and ability of interprofessional collaboration: A pilot study
Author(s) -
Lin YuChih,
Chan TeFu,
Lai ChungSheng,
Chin ChiChun,
Chou FanHao,
Lin HuiJu
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
the kaohsiung journal of medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.439
H-Index - 36
eISSN - 2410-8650
pISSN - 1607-551X
DOI - 10.1016/j.kjms.2013.05.006
Subject(s) - curriculum , medicine , medical education , interprofessional education , teamwork , cronbach's alpha , test (biology) , health care , nursing , session (web analytics) , psychology , pedagogy , psychometrics , clinical psychology , paleontology , world wide web , political science , computer science , law , economics , biology , economic growth
Clinical ethic situations in modern multiprofessional healthcare systems may involve different healthcare professions who work together for patient care. The undergraduate interprofessional education of clinical ethics would help to incubate healthcare students' ability of interprofessional collaboration in solving ethical problems. However, the impact from an interprofessional educational model on student's attitudes and confidence of interprofessional collaboration should be carefully evaluated during the process of curricular development. This study aimed to conduct a pilot interprofessional PBL curriculum of clinical ethics and evaluate the curricular impact on interprofessional students' attitude and confidence of collaborative teamwork. Thirty‐six medical and nursing students volunteered to participate in this study and were divided into three groups (medical group, nursing group, and mixed group). Tutors were recruited from the Medical School and the College of Nursing. The pilot curriculum included one lecture of clinical ethics, one PBL case study with two tutorial sessions, and one session of group discussion and feedback. A narrative story with multiple story lines and a multiperspective problem analysis tool were used in the PBL tutorials. The students' self‐evaluation of learning questionnaire was used to evaluate students' learning of clinical ethics and interprofessional collaborative skills and attitude. The internal consistency of the questionnaire was measured by Cronbach α, and the criterion‐related validity of the questionnaire was evaluated through associations between the dimension scores with the student group by one‐way analysis of variance test (ANOVA) test and Tukey‐Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) comparison. There was significant difference among different groups in students' ability and attitudes about “interprofessional communication and collaboration” ( p  = 0.0184). The scores in the mixed group (37.58 ± 3.26) were higher than the medical group (32.10 ± 4.98). In conclusion, our model for the interprofessional PBL curriculum of clinical ethics is practicable and will produce positive impacts on students' attitudes and confidence of interprofessional collaboration.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here