Evaluating interprofessional education: An important step to improving practice and influencing policy
Author(s) -
Liz Anderson
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of taibah university medical sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.269
H-Index - 19
ISSN - 1658-3612
DOI - 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.08.012
Subject(s) - curriculum , interprofessional education , context (archaeology) , suite , engineering ethics , medical education , quality (philosophy) , knowledge base , work (physics) , professional development , psychology , health care , medicine , pedagogy , political science , engineering , computer science , law , paleontology , philosophy , mechanical engineering , epistemology , world wide web , biology
The introduction of interprofessional education (IPE) into a professional curriculum requires thorough evaluation not only to guide educators concerning the quality of learning but also to report to professional bodies and influence policy. More work is needed to add to the growing evidence base, particularly with respect to aligning with a suite of claims for IPE. This can result in transformations in student attitudes and behaviours towards positive changes in service design and delivery to advance patient care. The steps for a robust evaluation are outlined within the context of moving from start-up pilot studies to programme evaluations in which IPE is a component of a professional curriculum. Beginning requires remaining mindful of the place of theory in forming frameworks and testing hypotheses while organisational and practical issues such as ethical considerations must be firmly in place. The need for addressing the gaps within the evidence base is considered
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom