Difference in spontaneous myocardial infarction and mortality in percutaneous versus surgical revascularization trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis | Zendy

Mario Gaudino | Zendy; Antonino Di Franco | Zendy; Cristiano Spadaccio | Zendy; Mohamed Rahouma | Zendy; N. Bryce Robinson | Zendy; Michelle Demetres | Zendy; Stephen E. Fremes | Zendy; Torsten Doenst | Zendy

Open Access

Difference in spontaneous myocardial infarction and mortality in percutaneous versus surgical revascularization trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s) -

Mario Gaudino,

Antonino Di Franco,

Cristiano Spadaccio,

Mohamed Rahouma,

N. Bryce Robinson,

Michelle Demetres,

Stephen E. Fremes,

Torsten Doenst

Publication year - 2021

Publication title -

journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 1.458

H-Index - 192

eISSN - 1085-8687

pISSN - 0022-5223

DOI - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.04.062

Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , myocardial infarction , meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , percutaneous coronary intervention , subgroup analysis , cardiology , revascularization , confidence interval , coronary artery disease , coronary artery bypass surgery , surgery , artery

It has been hypothesized that the survival benefit of coronary artery bypass (CABG) compared with percutaneous interventions (PCI) may be associated with the reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction (SMI) achieved by surgery. This, however, has not been formally investigated. The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the association between the difference in SMI and in survival in PCI versus CABG randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research