Premium
The impact of power and relationship commitment on the integration between manufacturers and customers in a supply chain
Author(s) -
Zhao Xiande,
Huo Baofeng,
Flynn Barbara B.,
Yeung Jeff Hoi Yan
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of operations management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.649
H-Index - 191
eISSN - 1873-1317
pISSN - 0272-6963
DOI - 10.1016/j.jom.2007.08.002
Subject(s) - business , power (physics) , marketing , perspective (graphical) , supply chain , normative , referent , organizational commitment , collectivism , supply chain management , psychology , social psychology , economics , computer science , political science , physics , quantum mechanics , market economy , linguistics , philosophy , artificial intelligence , individualism , law
Supply chain integration (SCI) has received increasing attention from scholars and practitioners in recent years. However, our knowledge of what influences SCI is still very limited. Although marketing and management researchers have investigated power and relationship commitment issues between organizations, few have examined their impact on SCI. This paper extends the power–relationship commitment theory established in Western marketing literature and links it with SCI in China, through examining the relationship between power, relationship commitment and the integration between manufacturers and their customers. We propose and empirically test a model using data collected from 617 manufacturing companies in China. The results show that different types of customer power impact manufacturers’ relationship commitment in different ways. Expert power, referent power and reward power are important in improving manufacturers’ normative relationship commitment, while reward power and coercive power enhance instrumental relationship commitment. We also found that normative relationship commitment had a greater impact on customer integration than instrumental relationship commitment. These findings are interpreted in light of national culture differences between China and the U.S. in terms of power distance and collectivism, which provide a new perspective on SCI.