
More needles less pain: The use of local anaesthesia during emergency arterial sampling
Author(s) -
Ruslan Zinchenko,
Nicolaas Jacobus Prinsloo,
Anton Zarafov,
Maciej T. Grzesiak,
Anthony Cohn
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of acute disease
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2589-5516
pISSN - 2221-6189
DOI - 10.1016/j.joad.2016.03.013
Subject(s) - medicine , anesthesia , sampling (signal processing) , regional anaesthesia , filter (signal processing) , computer science , computer vision
ObjectiveTo explore the attitudes toward the use of local anesthetic (LA) in arterial blood gas sampling and the awareness and adherence to British Thoracic Society guidelines.MethodsAn anonymous eight-item survey was distributed among medical professionals in two teaching and two district general hospitals.ResultsIn total 153 medical professionals were surveyed. Sixty-five percent have never had any training in administering LA. Most thought that arterial blood gas sampling was either “quite painful” (61%) or “extremely painful” (20%). However, 58% believed that patients should only “sometimes” be offered LA. Over half of the respondents (56%) never used LA before arterial blood gas sampling and 34% only used it “sometimes”. The majority (53%) stated that they would “sometimes” use LA in the future and 23% said that they would never use it.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that British Thoracic Society guidelines are not followed across the four hospitals. Despite the acknowledgment of arterial sampling being a painful procedure and the belief that patients should be offered LA at least “sometimes”, over half of the respondents never use it. Addressing the above-mentioned issues by introducing local guidelines and teaching sessions, as well as making LA more available, will help make this practice routine