Open AccessEffectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin in “real‐world” Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation: A single‐center observational study
Author(s) -
Naganuma Miyoko,
Shiga Tsuyoshi,
Nagao Takehiko,
Suzuki Atsushi,
Murasaki Kagari,
Hagiwara Nobuhisa
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2016.07.007
Subject(s) - medicine , dabigatran , warfarin , atrial fibrillation , propensity score matching , observational study , hazard ratio , major bleeding , randomized controlled trial , confidence interval
Background In “real‐world” practice, anticoagulant therapy is indicated for patients whose clinical profiles are not addressed in randomized clinical trials. We assessed the effectiveness and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin in “real‐world” Japanese patients with non‐valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods Among 613 NVAF patients who initiated dabigatran or warfarin therapy during the period between 2011 and 2013, 362 patients were included in the study after propensity score adjustment. The median follow‐up period was 1.3 years. The effectiveness and safety outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding, respectively. Results The propensity‐matched hazard ratios of thromboembolism and major bleeding with dabigatran were 1.03 (95% CI: 0.12–8.04, p =0.971) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01–0.90, p =0.037), respectively. Conclusions The ability of dabigatran to prevent thromboembolism is comparable to that of warfarin; however, the major bleeding rate is lower with dabigatran in “real‐world” NVAF patients.