z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Byung Gyu Kim et al.: Reduced systemic vascular resistance is the underlying hemodynamic mechanism in nitrate‐stimulated vasovagal syncope during head‐up tilt‐table test
Author(s) -
Eräranta Arttu,
Tikkakoski Antti,
Pörsti Ilkka H.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2016.04.001
Subject(s) - vascular resistance , medicine , central venous pressure , cardiac index , hemodynamics , mean arterial pressure , mean circulatory filling pressure , blood pressure , cardiology , cardiac output , anesthesia , heart rate
Dear Editor We read with great interest the well-crafted article by Kim et al. [1], which reported that presyncopal symptoms during nitrate-stimulated tilt-testing could be explained by decreased systemic vascular resistance (SVR) rather than reduced cardiac output (CO). The study setup is sound, but being accustomed to this methodology [2,3], we noticed inaccuracies in Tables 2 and 3. The SVR values appear correct, whereas the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) values presented seem incorrect. SVR is calculated as 80(MAP-CVP)/CO, where MAP is mean arterial pressure and CVP is central venous pressure. The normal values of SVR range from 800 to 1200 dynes s/cm [4], consistent with the original article [1]. SVRI is calculated as 80*(MAP-CVP)/CI, where CI is cardiac index [5]; and the formula equals 80*(MAP-CVP)/(CO/ BSA), where BSA is body surface area. This formula may also be presented as SVRI1⁄4SVR*BSA, and the normal values of SVRI range from 1900 to 2400 dynes s m/cm [2,3,5]. Notably, the reported SVRI values in the article by Kim et al. [1] range from 612 to 683 and the units are given as dynes s/cm/m, indicating that the SVR values were divided and not multiplied by BSA. The correct SVRI units should be presented as either dynes s/(cm/m) or dynes s*m/cm. We estimated that the proper SVRI values in the study conducted by Kim et al. [1] would range from 1900 to 2300 dynes s m/cm. We agree with the general results and conclusions of the article; however, the SVRI results should be recalculated.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here