
A case of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a non‐pulmonary vein trigger identified by intravenous adenosine triphosphate infusion
Author(s) -
Esato Masahiro,
Nishioto,
Kida Yoshitomi,
Chun YeongHwa
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2015.03.004
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , pulmonary vein , cardiology , ablation , catheter ablation , bolus (digestion) , anesthesia , paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , catheter , surgery
A 54‐year‐old woman was referred to our institution with frequent chest discomfort and was diagnosed with drug‐refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) was performed using a three‐dimensional electroanatomic mapping system. After completion of left and right circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI), an intravenous bolus of adenosine triphosphate (ATP, 20 mg) was administered to evaluate the electric reconduction between the pulmonary vein (PV) and left atrium (LA). Although no PV–LA reconduction was observed, atrial fibrillation (AF) was reproducibly induced. As the duration of AF was very short (<20 s), no further RFCA to the LA was performed. One month later, the patient presented with frequent atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs), and RFCA was repeated. Although no electric reconduction was observed in the left‐ or right‐sided PVs, incessant ATs and AF were induced after an intravenous bolus administration of ATP. The earliest atrial activation site initiating ATs was consistently identified from electrodes positioned in the superior vena cava (SVC), and both ATs and AF were no longer inducible after electric isolation of the SVC. ATP‐induced PV/non‐PV ectopy may be a marker of increased susceptibility to autonomic triggers of AF and could potentially predict recurrent AF after CPVI.