Open AccessUsefulness of entrainment mapping using the activation sequence of the last captured excitation in complex dual‐loop atrial tachycardia
Author(s) -
Fujiki Akira,
Yoshioka Ryozo,
Sakabe Masao
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2014.09.006
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial tachycardia , entrainment (biomusicology) , dual (grammatical number) , tachycardia , cardiology , loop (graph theory) , sequence (biology) , control theory (sociology) , atrial fibrillation , artificial intelligence , catheter ablation , combinatorics , computer science , genetics , mathematics , art , literature , control (management) , biology , rhythm
Background Electroanatomical mapping is useful for locating the atrial reentrant circuit, but analysis of the dynamic relation of the reentrant circuit is sometimes difficult. This article describes three cases of complex dual‐loop reentrant atrial tachycardia analyzed by entrainment mapping using not only the postpacing interval (PPI) but also the activation sequence of the last captured beats. Methods Case 1 was dual‐loop reentry consisting of the tricuspid annulus (TA) and a localized atrial reentry at the coronary sinus (CS) ostium with different exit sites to the right and the left atrium that was cured by catheter ablation at the CS ostium showing fractionated potential. Case 2 was dual‐loop reentry around the TA and the superior trans‐septal incision line. Case 3 was dual‐loop reentry around the TA and longitudinal dissociation along the cavo‐tricuspid isthmus. Results In Cases 1 and 2, entrainment with a shorter pacing cycle length demonstrated antidromic penetration to the circuit and changed the activation sequence of the last captured beat depending on the anatomical relation of the reentrant circuit. In Cases 1–3 with dual‐loop reentry, the excitation wavefront induced by stimulation entered one circuit after going around the other; thus, the penetration to the other reentry circuit became the second beat after the stimulus (one lap behind). Conclusions The PPI is obtained from the pacing site only, but the last captured beat could be obtained from all electrodes. It is advantageous to use the information from all available electrode recordings to determine the dynamic relation between complex dual‐loop reentrant circuits.