
Prophylactic catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator devices
Author(s) -
Niwano Shinichi,
Oikawa Jun,
Fukaya Hidehira
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2013.05.003
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , ventricular tachycardia , cardiology , ventricular fibrillation , ablation , catheter ablation , cardiac resynchronization therapy , heart failure , tachycardia , ejection fraction
Background Although the use of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy device with a defibrillator (ICD/CRT‐D) is the principal therapy for patients with life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), prophylactic VT ablation may reduce arrhythmic episodes and mortality in patients with an ICD/CRT‐D. In this retrospective study, the prognoses among patient groups with different results of attempted VT ablation were compared. Methods The study population consisted of 151 consecutive patients with an ICD/CRT‐D and structural heart disease. The mean age was 64±9 years, and 63 of the 151 patients were women. Of the 151 patients, 117 cases underwent catheter ablation procedure for elimination of monomorphic VT. The 151 patients were divided into 3 groups based on the results of the ablation or whether ablation was attempted, i.e., success, failure, and not‐attempted groups ( n =87, 30, and 34, respectively). The event rate of VT/VF and total mortality were compared among the 3 groups. Results During a follow‐up period of 31±22 months, VT/VF episodes and death occurred in 45 (30%) and 16 (11%) patients, respectively. When comparing the 3 groups, the rates of VT/VF episodes and death were significantly lower in the success group than in the failure and not‐attempted groups (16.1%, 46.7%, 50.0%, p =0.0001 and 6.9%, 20.0%, 11.8%, p =0.0213, respectively). Conclusion In patients with an ICD/CRT‐D implant for VT/VF, prophylactic ablation of monomorphic VT may reduce morbidity and mortality.