z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Prophylactic catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter–defibrillator devices
Author(s) -
Niwano Shinichi,
Oikawa Jun,
Fukaya Hidehira
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2013.05.003
Subject(s) - medicine , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , ventricular tachycardia , cardiology , ventricular fibrillation , ablation , catheter ablation , cardiac resynchronization therapy , heart failure , tachycardia , ejection fraction
Background Although the use of implantable cardioverter–defibrillator/cardiac resynchronization therapy device with a defibrillator (ICD/CRT‐D) is the principal therapy for patients with life‐threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF), prophylactic VT ablation may reduce arrhythmic episodes and mortality in patients with an ICD/CRT‐D. In this retrospective study, the prognoses among patient groups with different results of attempted VT ablation were compared. Methods The study population consisted of 151 consecutive patients with an ICD/CRT‐D and structural heart disease. The mean age was 64±9 years, and 63 of the 151 patients were women. Of the 151 patients, 117 cases underwent catheter ablation procedure for elimination of monomorphic VT. The 151 patients were divided into 3 groups based on the results of the ablation or whether ablation was attempted, i.e., success, failure, and not‐attempted groups ( n =87, 30, and 34, respectively). The event rate of VT/VF and total mortality were compared among the 3 groups. Results During a follow‐up period of 31±22 months, VT/VF episodes and death occurred in 45 (30%) and 16 (11%) patients, respectively. When comparing the 3 groups, the rates of VT/VF episodes and death were significantly lower in the success group than in the failure and not‐attempted groups (16.1%, 46.7%, 50.0%, p =0.0001 and 6.9%, 20.0%, 11.8%, p =0.0213, respectively). Conclusion In patients with an ICD/CRT‐D implant for VT/VF, prophylactic ablation of monomorphic VT may reduce morbidity and mortality.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here