
Risk of defibrillation threshold testing in severe heart failure patient: A case of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT‐D) with acute myocardial infarction
Author(s) -
Nakai Toshiko,
Ohkubo Kimie,
Okumura Yasuo,
Kunimoto Satoshi,
Kasamaki Yuji,
Watanabe Ichiro,
Hirayama Atsushi
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of arrhythmia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.463
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1883-2148
pISSN - 1880-4276
DOI - 10.1016/j.joa.2012.03.009
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiology , defibrillation , myocardial infarction , defibrillation threshold , heart failure , cardiac resynchronization therapy , implantable cardioverter defibrillator , cardioversion , ventricular fibrillation , atrial fibrillation , ejection fraction
Defibrillation threshold (DFT) testing is usually recommended after device implantation to confirm appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT‐D) function [1,2]. However, induction of ventricular fibrillation may result in hemodynamic compromise, and cardioversion itself may cause myocardial injury [3,4]. We report on a CRT‐D patient with acute myocardial infarction who died due to multiple organ failure 1 day after DFT testing. Our case emphasizes the importance of deciding whether DFT testing should be performed for patients with very severe heart failure in the acute stage of myocardial infarction.